If you asked any of the designers at my office, “How many designers does it take to change a light bulb?”, I already know that one of them would pipe up with this  answer: “Does it have to be a light bulb?”

Har, har, har!

But seriously, they would challenge the very essence of my question because designers, or rather people engaged in design thinking, tend to ask a lot of questions—especially ones that challenge existing assumptions.

And yes, maybe these questions would be dubbed pure foolishness by those married to a certain process or strategy of doing things, but as author, Warren Berger, points out, questions are “the starting point in the design process, and [they] have a profound influence on everything that follows.”

He’s correct you know. Just think of how many times you sat deliberating about the same old issue at your office. It’s kind of like the vintage FedEx commercial, that shows how corporate insiders can get so stuck in a rut that they no longer think for themselves. It takes an outsider to see the situation clearly and state the obvious.

Berger knows what I’m getting at. The Glimmer author spent much time studying the likes of Bruce Mau, Richard Saul Wurman and Paula Scher, the most respected designers in the biz, who constantly talk about the importance of asking those so-called “stupid questions”.

In an article this morning from the Harvard Business Review, Berger outlines specific ways that people in business can learn from studying design thinking to achieve significant eureka moments by learning to question, care, connect and commit to a final solution. Read on for Berger’s full article and find out why you should pay more attention to the way designers think.

Design Thinking Insight from Captain James T. Kirk

Last week we took a look at how design thinking was used by a group of USU design students to solve a structural problem at the famed Great St. Bernard Hospice in the Swiss Alps. Well, I’m still thinking about it …

So I’ve decided to geek-up today’s blog post with a little Captain James T. Kirk insight into the situation. Why? Because, one, I like Star Trek. And because, two, this new way of thinking challenges each and every one of us to find alternative ways to solve problems—thus giving us more options to play with … and this girl loves options!

So how does one get in the habit of creating more options?

James T. Kirk coined this the practice of creating a “third option”, which means innovating and creating new ideas and new technology, not just out of self-interest, but also for the common good—as opposed to being stuck with just two undesirable choices. You see, I’m on to something here …

In my humble opinion, there are three steps involved in solving any problem:

1. First step back from the immediate issue and take a look at the big picture. After all, finding a solution to any problem is best approached by first understanding the larger whole (the problem itself is usually an ingrained part of the larger system after all). Am I right?

2. Next, come to understand the whole situation by bringing folks with different expertise on board—designers, artists, MBAs, technologists, sociologists, communicators, etc.—all add value just because they approach the problem from a different angle, with a different background, and with different skill sets.

3. Lastly, get a fresh perspective on the situation. You have to admit, breakthroughs in any field—medicine, technology, art—would never occur if people didn’t approach them with fresh points of view. It’s this lack of fresh insight that often keeps companies stuck in a rut, unable to break out of old patterns and politics. Anyone, no matter how clever, working at the same job and in the same position for many years, comes to accept certain patterns—never questioning, always accepting. Newbies, on the other hand, question everything—especially things that seem obvious to everyone else. You’ve heard the old adage “there are no stupid questions”? Well, outsiders have permission to question the standard way of doing things. And that’s often when results start to happen.

All Star Trek analogies aside … what do you think? Am I onto something?

Design Students Put Creative Problem Solving into Practice

I recently finished Warren Berger’s book, Glimmer, about how design thinking can transform the world. If you haven’t read it, you should.

And it explains why my interest was peaked this morning when my colleague, James, Tweeted about a group of Utah State University students who went to Switzerland to study creative thinking. This cultivation of right brain (or creative thinking) to solve problems and further innovation is exactly what many, like Berger, call “design thinking”.

And more and more students are calling on the right sides of their brains to not only solve problems, but to get a job. “There’s a new field emerging,” says Bob Winward, the graphic design professor who led the student trip, “…today’s successful businesses are driven by innovation and creativity.” Berger would agree that the world is undergoing a huge shift—our largely informational economy is transforming into a conceptual one where intuitive thought will replace logic.

And before you exclaim, “Well this might be all well and good in theory, but what about in real life?” Let me tell you, the students soon put “design thinking” to practice when they found themselves snowshoeing the Swiss Alps to the famed Great St. Bernard Hospice where monks tasked them with reconstructing gigantic kennels for the St. Bernard dogs—traditionally bred to rescue travelers caught in avalanches. The harsh conditions, risk of snow slides and 60-pound steel beams used to construct the kennels were all figured into the bona fide design thinking process.

But that’s not all…the students learned the most important lesson of all from the monks (clients) themselves, according to graphic design student Rich Wills, “You have to learn how to understand other people if you’re going to design things for people.”